WILL THE ARROGANT CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT THUMB ITS NOSE AT THE MAJORITY ONCE AGAIN?

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Cry baby gay activists who love our democracy when it works for them, but loathe it when it works against their agenda, is waiting with baited breath on a ruling from “The Gods.”

The Gods in this case are the Judges who make up the California Supreme Court. When voters in California approved a Constitutional Amendment that said a marriage is between a man and a woman, homosexual activists who did not agree with the majority of we, “The People,” went crying to a sympathetic court!

They got what they wanted!

Bold and brazen Judges on California’s highest court literally threw out “The Constitution,” and in its place, “Made Their Own Law.”

They said homosexuals had the right to marry those of the same gender. Not willing to give up, “The Majority” in California went back to the drawing boards, and re-worded its next Constitutional Amendment!

The results, Californians overwhelmingly spoke in “One Loud” and clear voice, “A MARRIAGE IS BETWEEN ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN.”

Angry mobs of homosexuals took to the streets in a number of American cities. Reports say that many of these people broke the law, however, “Frightened Police” reportedly didn’t make a single arrest.

I supposed that they would have been hit with that tired, worn out slogan of being a, “White Racist, Bigoted, Homophobe.”

After venting, homosexuals went back to their pals on California’s Supreme Court, who now have quite a dilemma on their hands!

Do they pull out their “Shredding Machine And Once Again Feed The Constitution Through It?”

Or do these terrorists in black robes, follow the law, and “Not Make The Law?”

After hearing oral arguments on this controversial case, these criminal judges have three months to render a decision. By the way, I call them criminals because by tossing out a Constitutional Amendment approved by the citizens of California, these disrespectful jurists told the good people of the Golden State, “You Are Better Off Breaking The Law–Than Upholding It.”

Because this is exactly what they did when they decided to be the arbiter of the cutural mores of the majority of the people in California.

Supporters of gay marriage and this includes the rogue Attorney General of that state, Jerry “Moon Bean” Brown, argue that it is in the United States Constitution that says “Homosexuals Have A Right To Marry.”

Trust me, the Framers who were God-Fearing men were not thinking of homosexuals when they said on July 4, 1776 in The Declaration of Independence of the Thirten Colonies:

” We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness–that to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,–that whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect safety and Happiness”

Lawyers for homosexuals like to hang their hats on, “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

What the Framers were saying here was, “You Have A Right To Live A Full Life As Free Men And Women. If You So Choose, You Can Be Happy.”

Acts of homosexuality would have been viewed by men and women during America’s early days as antithetical to the word of God. Millions of Americans continue to look at this “Disorder” as immoral. However, what this crowd is trying to do is make the Constitution a, “Living, Breathing Document.”

What they mean when they say this is, “The Constitution Should Ebb And Flow According To Our Wishes.”

In other words, “We Have A Right To Re-Write The Constitution To Fit Our Carnality.”

The biggest supporter of this skewed thinking is none other than the socialist President in the White House, Barack Hussein-Obama.”

This is where you lose me and millions of other Americans. The secular left are a destructive people. Look at the mess that they have created in less than a half-century. Homosexuals fall on the left!

Rogue judges are leftists!

In the meantime, the California Supreme Court has indicated that it might play, “King Solomon.”

By this I mean, the Court intimated that it would let stand some “18-thousand gay marriages that were ‘legalized’ prior to this second Constitutional Amendment being passed.”

They would next tell homosexuals that gay marriages are illegal in the state!

Talking about talking out of both sides of your mouths!

If the Judges take this route, they will be breaking the law a second time.

Remember, Californians already had approved a Constitutional Amendment outlawing gay marriages when these Judges stuck their “Big Noses” into the marriage debate.

Regardless of how these Judges rule, this battle will more than likely end up in the United States Supreme Court.

Let’s hope that it takes place before America’s socialist President has the chance to pack the Court with anti-God Judges, like “Chuck Shumer, Or, Hillary Rodham-Clinton.”

Advertisements

2 Comments

  1. Posted March 9, 2009 at 2:19 pm | Permalink

    I mean this respectfully – Why are so many partisans so angry? Can you not make a point without calling names and mocking? I believe even famous partisans like Rush Limbaugh turn off a whole group of people who might otherwise listen to him if he did not ridicule the opposition. And he is mild compared to others.

    On to the substance. It probably won’t go to the Supreme Court for one reason. The plaintiffs’ were carefully to base their claim on California State law only. That means the Supreme Court should not take it. You never know in the world we live in, but that’s what will likely be. The reason they did this is so that other groups in other states can take shots at the prize without having a Supreme Court decision blocking them. If Obama gets to change the make up of the court, they can try again in Calif. too and this time bring up federal law.

    A split decision which legitimizes the already existing same sex marriages is quite possible, and legally, makes sense. Those marriages were lawful or they would not have had this constitutional amendment. To deprive them of it would probably violate due process. Based on your own principles, I presume you wouldn’t want to suggest that the law should change according to your wishes.

    See. No insults. By the way, I’m not gay, not a partisan (I’ve voted for two democrats and two Republicans in the last four elections) but I am godless. I sure hope that doesn’t make me a bad person.

  2. Posted March 9, 2009 at 4:45 pm | Permalink

    David, first of all, thank you for your thoughtful comment. Now, let’s cut to the chase. You preface your remarks by asking, “Why are so many partisans so angry?” David, we are angry because we see our country being transformed from a democracy to a socialist nation. Those of us who have the ability to think in an esoteric fashion can see right through the gamesmanship of Barack Hussein-Obama. We understand who he is, and what his plans are for this country. Many of us David, fought in wars, so that people like you can live free; and to also voice your opinion on anything that you’d like; without fear of someone knocking down your door, and taking you off to prison, or worse yet, to be shot. We fear that that day might be fast approaching when Americans will not be able to speak in the public square about whatever issues they want to. You appear to have a problem with individuals who are angry. David, “Justified Anger” is healthy. Here is why. First, it provides the person with an opportunity to experience a catharsis, which purges his or her system of toxins which if internalized, could cause irreparable harm. Justified anger David, is what the “Founders” used to stand up to King George the III. I don’t believe you would have asked them, “Why Are You So Angry?” Unjustified angeris what I find to be problematic. Many on your side of the aisle are filled with this emotion. From the global warming zealots to the unjustified anger that we find in the homosexual community over their not being allowed “to marry.” By the way, in five thousand years of recorded history, there is not one shred of evidence that shows any civilized society sinking to the level we have regarding allowing people of the same gender to, “marry.” Does that anger me, you damn right it does. Left un-checked, where do we stop with this crazy carnality?

    You read my column. Obviously, I made points. Otherwise, I do not believe that you would have, (1) Read my writing in its entirety, and (2) You wouldn’t have written a comment to me. The names that I used, along with what you call, “mocking,” got your attention didn’t it? Sure, I could write a nice, little “Rebecca Of Sunnybrook Farm Piece” for people like you. But, that wouldn’t be me. It would please you, but I’m not in the business of pleasing you are anyone else. I’m in the business of “Informing The American People” on what socialist Democrats are doing to their country!

    The fact that you had to write that you are not gay, makes me believe that you are. I couldn’t care less what your sexual preference is. What two people do behind closed doors is their business. However, when they march that behavior out into the public square, and demand that I sanction it, this is where the problem starts. You are not a partisan? Good for you. I am. I want the best for this country. Right now, neither party is looking out for the people. The fact that you voted for a Republican indicates that you live in a liberal state or district. I do not get the impression that you would vote for a, “True Conservative Politician.”

    Lastly, you said, “a split decision which legitimizes the alredy existing same sex marriage is quite possible, and equally makes sense.” No it doesn’t. These “Activists Judges” broke the law when they overturned “A Constitutionally Approved Amendment Voted For By The People.” These “Terrorists Made Law–Instead Of Interpreting Same.” In essence, they said to the majority in California, “We Will Decide What Is Best For You.” Clearly, they overstepped their bounds.

    Finally, God forbid if Hussein-Obama gets a chance to appoint even one Justice to the U.S. Supreme Court. You seem like a smart fellow. I hope that you open your eyes before it is too late!

    Dr. Forest Lewis


Post a Comment

Required fields are marked *

*
*

%d bloggers like this: